| How
many times have you heard industry bosses and politicians
say, “There is a shortage of skilled workers”? This is
an infuriatingly ignorant statement that is often made
by silver-haired professionals who are probably not too
far away from drawing a pension themselves. There may
well be a shortage of young, skilled workers, but there
is a large and relatively untapped sector of 40 and 50-something
citizens, with a wealth of accumulated skills, experience,
wisdom and dedication that could be invaluable to employers.
Of course,
ageism exists even when you are in your twenties and
thirties. Thirteen years ago, at the age of 29 and following
the birth of my third child, I attended an interview
at Reader’s Digest in Swindon. I have no morals about
exposing the company, since they claim not to discriminate
against anyone irrespective of age, colour or disability.
The first interview involved a series of Mensa tests
and a face-to-face interview with one of the bosses,
who quickly scanned my CV* with an ill-concealed smirk
and one of those “Ah, mother of several kids -- obviously
brain dead” type of expression. It was this expression
that gave me the motivation to excel in the tests, even
though I had probably already decided that I didn’t
want the job.
Imagine
my surprise when I was called back for a second interview,
this time with the rather smarmy-sounding manager of
the department for whom the successful candidate would
be working. After briefly informing me that I had achieved
the top score out of all the applicants who had taken
the test, including some candidates already employed
within the company, he went on to question me about
my children, my childcare provisions and my family commitments
in general. He made it clear that he was only interested
in employing a workforce under the age of 25 and without
commitments outside the working environment.
Needless
to say, I didn’t get the job, but instead of being disappointed,
I was grateful. I would never have wanted to work for
an employer with such a bigoted and out-of-touch attitude.
His mind-set also made a complete mockery of the intelligence
tests, when clearly he would rather have a young, intellectually-challenged,
footloose and fancy-free floozy floating around the
office in a micro mini, than a bright, diligent and
conscientious dinosaur who might start taking regular
“sickies” to deal with family or arthritis problems.
I stopped
putting my date of birth on my CV* years ago. I figured
that employers would then be forced to read the entire
CV*, even if it was only to look for clues about my
age. Besides, since most forms of discrimination are
allegedly against the law, I didn’t see any reason why
I should have to declare my fossilised status. Since
doing that however, I have managed to secure every job
I have really wanted because by focusing on my experience
instead of my age, I have not automatically been written
off by pre-conceived assumptions about mature people.
I am still only 42 and now have four children but, thankfully,
since I now operate largely on a remote basis as a freelance
writer, my age and family circumstances are of no consequence.
I presume that that is because I am not required to
decorate an office, nor greet people face-to-face with
a youthful glow, nor rush off home if one of my children
has a temperature.
The ridiculous
fact is that ageism is undoubtedly costing the British
economy billions of pounds every year, because businesses
are focusing on age rather than ability and are failing
to recruit or promote talented, but more mature staff.
I can only assume that employers believe that in taking
on young, dynamic and innovative staff who will eventually
move on to new pastures, the company will benefit more
than if they employed more experienced, solid and reliable
oldies who would potentially remain with the company
until retirement.
There
is also a myth that older generations are either out-of-touch
with new technology or else are reluctant to learn new
concepts. Older people are often more conscientious
and have more patience and perseverance than younger
generations, and anyone who was competent with old IT
can quickly learn new IT. It’s not difficult. When I
was employed by my last company, Siemens, I had never
used Microsoft packages in my entire life. However,
I learned “on the job” and effectively taught myself
very quickly. After a few weeks, I was competent with
Microsoft Word, Publisher, PowerPoint and Visio and
within a few months I was teaching other people – including
my boss – certain formatting tips and techniques. Did
you know that by 2025, a third of the UK population
will be aged 60 or over? The future success of the economy
therefore depends greatly on tapping in on the wealth
of experience that we grave-dodgers have to offer. It’s
time that some narrow-minded employers realised that
not everyone over the age of 50 is interested only in
sitting in the corner knitting ferret-coloured sweaters
all day, or tending a small vegetable patch on an allotment.
Some
employment agencies are taking a stance by refusing
to accept vacancies that set an upper age limit, but
this alone will not prevent companies from offering
positions to younger candidates. After all, how many
employers or personnel managers would admit to discriminating
against applicants because of their age? They may invite
the token older person for an interview, but many vacancies
be filled by a younger people, with the excuse that
their qualifications and experience (and firm breasts,
no doubt) are more suited to the role in question. An
employer is hardly likely to say, “Well actually you’re
far better qualified than any of the other candidates,
but you’re a bit of an old duffer and you don’t quite
have that cute face or bum that I’d like to ogle at
on a daily basis, do you?”
Of course,
ageism in the workplace exists at all levels. There
will be candidates in their teens and twenties who have
been turned down for roles because they are “too young”,
but the good news for these people is that they will
get older and more doors will open for them. Older people,
unfortunately, will not get younger, but the news is
not all bad. There are many more employers out there
who have the judiciousness to take advantage of the
wealth of experience that older people have to offer
and are thus not adding to the endemic problem of workforce
shortages.
It would
be interesting to see whether companies who have the
sense to appoint older, skilled people are more successful
than those whose policies include a secret clause of
only hiring those who are still in the spring of their
lives.
Everyone
ages and invaluable wisdom grows as each year passes,
so isn’t it time that more companies employed people
because of their age and not in spite of it?
* CV is
abbreviation for Curriculum Vitae also called Resume.
Article reprinted with permission
through www.IdeaMarketers.com
|